Mastery

Malcolm Gladwell famously stated it takes 10,000 hours to master a skill. This has been debunked over and over again by various experts. You can’t reduce growth and development to a formula: 10,000 hours = Mastery! How you spend each hour is the key.

I’m reminded of story I heard from my tai chi instructor:

A student of tai chi isn’t making any progress. The teacher asks him, “Have you practiced?”

The student replies, “I’ve practiced 100 hours since our last class.”

The teacher asks, “What do you do when you practice?”

“I do the form.”

“Do you pay attention to how you’re applying the principles?”

“No.”

“Do you actively seek out pockets of tension in your body and try to let it go?”

“No.”

The teacher tells the student, “You have not practiced 100 hours. You practiced one hour, 100 times.”

Intent and attention drive development. Even 10,000 hours will only add up to mastery if you spend those hours the right way. This brings me back to something I’ve posted about before: our cultural beliefs about time. “Time equals money!” is a frequent declaration, and it implies that we should reduce time spent in order to maximize profit.

But the key to quality is attention and care. Attention and care require an investment of time. 10,000 hours is a lot of time!

It’s also true that “haste makes waste.” Things done quickly are usually not done well.

In the end, my conviction is that quality matters most. Quality requires an investment of time. Things take as long as they take, if you want them done well. Stop worrying about time. What matters, what brings value to our endeavors, is intent, attention, and care.

Diversity Means Survival

I was perusing Bluesky recently, and saw a post about the newly discovered Neanderthal animal fat processing site:

Please can we stop being _surprised_ at Neanderthal intelligence! They had c. 400,000 years, longer than we've been around, to develop sophisticated solutions to problemswww.livescience.com/archaeology/…

Natalie Bennett (@nataliegreenpeer.bsky.social) 2025-07-05T14:11:57.191Z

This was my reply to it:

Their brains were larger than ours, with proportional frontal lobes and cortical folding (we’re pretty sure), they created symbolic images, had funerary rites. So, yeah… We know they were smart, in most of same ways we are.

John the Librarian (he/him) (@johnthelibrarian.bsky.social) 2025-07-05T17:12:55.971Z

This got me thinking in a different way about the value of diversity.

We know that Neanderthal was as smart, maybe smarter, than us, and engaged in similar methods of thinking. And yet, they died out at the end of the last ice age and we didn’t. Why is that?

Continue reading “Diversity Means Survival”

Sometimes Our Job Is Hard

Several years ago, I worked for a nonprofit that did event-based fundraising. We purchased a new all-in-one software service that ran both the back-end fundraising and participant database, and our front-end event website, where participants could have a profile page and accept online donations. Because it was an all-in-one package, the way you configured each end affected how the other end functioned. Changes to any part of the system caused ripples to other parts. My job was to set up and configure the software, and provide tech support to participants.

The back-end database wasn’t easy to use: overly complicated, nonintuitive workflows. A colleague who worked in the accounting department, and who only interfaced with the back-end database, came to me with a list of things she hoped I could reconfigure to improve the workflow. I looked at the list and realized these changes would alter the participant front-end in ways that would make it much harder for people to use.

So I said no.

My colleague agreed when I showed her what the impact would be. We couldn’t make it harder for participants and donors in order to make our jobs easier. Better we deal with the difficulty than them.

I think about this whenever we look for ways to make our jobs easier. It’s totally fine to want to make our jobs easier, but there are going to be ripples that affect other people, either customers or colleagues. We need to be aware of how our workflows affect someone else’s, especially if we make their job more difficult in order to make ours easier. We need to consider whether that’s really what’s best for customers and the organization, and not just whether it’s best for ourselves.

Sometimes our job is just going to be hard.

Continue reading “Sometimes Our Job Is Hard”

Efficiency Is A Terrible Goal

In a recent discussion, a group of us were talking through options for using LLMs to make some our work tasks more efficient. I made the comment that I don’t believe efficiency is the correct goal for us to focus on. This statement set some of my colleagues aback. Modern American work culture is so steeped in the ideal of efficiency, it seems tantamount to sacrilege to suggest we shouldn’t value it the way we do.

I want to take some time here to unpack this belief. There are good reasons why I feel this way, but I also need to caution myself against dismissing the very real values that efficiency can bring.

Let’s start with a trite phrase: “Time is money.”

This phrase never sat quite right with me. It feels more correct to say, “Time is value.” On the face of it, these seem like they should be the same statement: money is intended as a measure of value, after all. But something interesting happens when you delve deeper into them.

Continue reading “Efficiency Is A Terrible Goal”

NaPoWriMo 2025: Wrap-Up

I did it! I completed NaPoWriMo 2025! With a couple caveats:

I didn’t write and post one poem per day. I kept up daily through April 5 (including the early-bird prompt on March 31), then fell about a week behind, then wrote a bunch of poems in one day to get mostly caught up, then fell about a week behind again, got mostly caught up all in one day… Regardless, I wrote thirty poems in thirty days.

I actually wrote more than thirty poems: Before the month even started, I wrote and posted a poem that popped into my head when I decided to participate; I did the early-bird prompt; and I wrote two poems on day sixteen (although one is a silly toss-off haiku which I probably shouldn’t count).

You’ll notice I didn’t post anything for day eight. (Even without this one, I still wrote more than thirty poems.) The prompt for this day was to write a ghazal, and frankly, I don’t think I can. I’m not skilled enough and I’m not confident to attempt one. I’m trying to talk myself into it, and one may be forthcoming, but I don’t promise anything. If I try it, I want to take it seriously, and not make a joke of it like I did with my sonnet this year (although I do really enjoy this joke!)

I don’t know why I didn’t title any of my work this year. I just… didn’t.

I enjoyed the prompts this year, more so than previous times I’ve participated, even though I didn’t strictly follow all of them. The inspirational links seemed disconnected from the prompts, which was a bit odd. Maybe I wasn’t clever enough to use the inspiration.

Continue reading “NaPoWriMo 2025: Wrap-Up”

NaPoWriMo 2025: Day 30

“Write a poem that … describes different times in which you’ve heard the same band or piece of music across your lifetime.” (https://www.napowrimo.net/day-thirty-11/)

My music lingers, in
my mind, my memory, my ears.
My music maintains meaning
down through all these years.

Music’s meaning may change,
age reveals new aspects.
New music enters my life,
new ways for meanings to connect.

A favorite song then,
years later, what was I
thinking? A favorite song
now, maybe someday to defy

its own meaning, as life
changes, music changes,
meaning changes. This is
the glory of how music ranges

The full spectrum of
human being, how it speaks
of the complexity of our
selves, our nadirs and peaks.

My music lingers,
long and lovely, loud
then quiet, soft and strident,
joyous, mourning, unbowed.

NaPoWriMo 2025: Day 29

“Write a poem that takes its inspiration from the life of a musician, poet, or other artist.” (https://www.napowrimo.net/day-twenty-nine-11/)

I simply cannot picture you
folding laundry.
I hear your glorious voice
coming through cheap speakers
as I cook
and I cannot picture you
at a stove
stirring a pot
(Of course you stirred
oh, so many metaphorical
pots in your career!)
or setting a table
or just generally
tidying up.
Your voice, such a regular
part of my quotidian experience,
yet I cannot see you
doing anything so normal.
I’m sure you did–
you having been a real
person, living your life,
you weren’t on tour
or in the studio
every second of
every day. You must
surely have done all
the normal things
we normal people do.
I simply cannot picture you
doing them. I need your
voice to soar,
to not be tied to the
mundane of normal.
I need your soaring voice
to take me away
from all this.

NaPoWriMo 2025: Day 28

“Write a poem that involves music at a ceremony or event of some kind.” (https://www.napowrimo.net/day-twenty-eight-11/)

I wonder nowadays what music
I should play at my father’s
funeral. He’s still very much
alive, healthy and content,
but I wonder, nevertheless.
Morbid to mull over, and
I do my best not to dwell
on it. But still, I wonder.
My father grew up with the
origins of rock ‘n’ roll,
came into adulthood to
the Beatles, Beach Boys,
Simon and Garfunkel, Dylan.
But he was never a musician,
and though he loves his
music, he’s not someone
clearly defined by the music
he loves. My father once
told me: “I wish I could have
made something beautiful.”
I want to play something
beautiful for him, when
the time comes. I have time,
still, to make my decision.
We’ve reached an age, now,
when I worry – just a bit –
every time the phone rings
at unexpected times. I don’t
want that call to ever come.
The time will never be right.
There will never be enough
time. It will always be
too soon. The glory of music
is as much in the ending
as in the song itself:
Music makes endings sweet,
imbues meaning in
the ceasing of time.

NaPoWriMo 2025: Day 27

“Write your own poem that describes a detail in a painting, and that begins … with a grand, declarative statement.” I used a sculpture, but it’s the same spirit. (https://www.napowrimo.net/day-twenty-seven-11/)

Never have I seen such monumental sorrow!
Never have I seen stone tremble in anguish!

The Roman Pietà composes a triangle,
From a hypotenuse of earthly rock,
Past the savior’s lolling body,
Drawing the eyes up toward heaven.

At the apex, Mary’s face, cast down in mourning,
overwhelmed by loss.
No mother should outlive her son.

The subtlety of veins in his hands and feet
Whisper immanent resurrection
and the promise of eternal life,
Render her anguish everlasting.

The humanity of this sculpture destroys me!
This is not a celebration of sacrifice.
This is a memorial to the grief of Mary,
a pietà in the truest sense:

Salvation at the cost of a mother’s eternal sorrow.

NaPoWriMo 2025: Day 26

“Try your hand at a sonnet – or at least something ‘sonnet-shaped.'” (https://www.napowrimo.net/day-twenty-six-11/)

Becambl starkle metpo kerplotnic,
Deoben sergalny nem pokalny,
Flerulglio swatzenti velnutic,
Tetragabant glepnidich feragny.

Flogtrebit nergozop declimos brooz,
Trombolismut destribux pyseglip;
Flompergutsymyn soglop nerficooz,
Flibbertegibbit! Vengatsorepip!

Vecnatsigen greplamplibsebensee
Prebanseant sertfectan glieren.
Prebanseteal fertactinentee,
Frectanol glipantsett sesascheerin.

(Pay attention! Lest we fail to mention,
All language is a human invention.)