My Least Favorite Books of 2016

In advance of my annual “Year in Reading” summary, I thought I’d post a list of the books I read this year that I liked least. Or, more accurately—the books that disappointed me the most. Because reading isn’t just about what you like—it’s about what you don’t like, too.

Inclusion on this list doesn’t necessarily mean the book is bad. There are titles here which are very good—they just weren’t my thing. Some titles make this list because I had hoped for more from them. Other titles are on this list because I genuinely believe they’re poor work.

This is not a definitive ranking. Titles are listed in alphabetical order by author.

Half a King by Joe Abercrombie

Half a King
Joe Abercrombie
(Del Ray, 2014)

You know how I just said that not all the books on this list are bad? This is one of those. It’s really very good. It’s solid fantasy from a skilled and popular author, with competent world-building and interesting characters. It’s just not my thing. Ironically, this is one of the titles I recommended most often to other people this year.


The Heart Goes Last by Margaret Atwood

The Heart Goes Last
Margaret Atwood
(Nan A. Talese, 2015)

I feel bad disliking a novel from Margaret Atwood. But this clearly isn’t her best. Her writing style is as masterful and delightful as ever, but the characters are all rather despicable and the plot has holes like Swiss cheese.

(Read my full review here »)


Into the Guns by William C. Dietz

Into the Guns
William C. Dietz
(Ace, 2016)

You know how I said some of the books on this list really are poorly done? I was mostly referring to this one. I hate it when people deride a work of art by saying, “I could do that!” I always want to answer them: “But you didn’t!” Seriously, though—I was a better writer than this when I was in 8th grade.


The Forgetting Moon by Brian Lee Durfee

The Forgetting Moon
Brian Lee Durfee
(Saga Press, 2016)

This is one those books which isn’t bad… but it’s not very good, either. I like the characters and I was genuinely invested in what happens to them. Everything else about this novel is generic and uninteresting. Also—I know you’re not supposed to judge a book by its cover, but this one screams “trying too hard”.


InterWorld by Neil Gaiman & Michael Reaves

Neil Gaiman & Michael Reaves
(HarperCollins, 2007)

This is another genuinely good book. I would have loved this novel when I was in middle school. But I picked it up expecting a Neil Gaiman book. It’s not.

(Read my full review here »)


Alice by Christina Henry

Christina Henry
(Penguin, 2015)

This novel is so good, but it would have been even better if the author didn’t insist on forcing it to be a dark, gritty riff on “Alice in Wonderland”. The story and characters deserved more freedom to stand on their own.

(Read my full review here »)


Two Years Eight Months and Twenty-Eight Nights by Salman Rushdie

Two Years Eight Months and Twenty-Eight Nights
Salman Rushdie
(Random House, 2015)

Rushdie’s position in the pantheon of our greatest living authors is assured. This novel isn’t what put him there.

(Read my full review here »)


Avengers of the Moon by Allen Steele

Avengers of the Moon
Allen Steele
(Tor, 2017)

Steele tries so hard to revamp old-fashioned pulp scifi for the present day. He comes really close, too, and this book is a lot of fun. But audiences today aren’t like they were during the Pulp Era and this kind of story doesn’t quite fit now. I’m sure some readers will absolutely adore this book and I can understand why.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.